Background Image
Previous Page  117 / 204 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 117 / 204 Next Page
Page Background

Notes To The

Financial Statements

As at 31 March 2019

2.

Significant accounting policies (cont’d.)

2.2 Standards issued but not yet effective (cont’d.)

MFRS 16 Leases (cont’d.)

Classification of cash flows will also be affected as operating lease payments under MFRS 117 are presented

as operating cash flows, whereas under MFRS 16, the lease payments will be split into a principal (which

will be presented as financing cash flows) and an interest portion (which will be presented as operating

cash flows).

Lessor accounting under MFRS 16 is substantially the same as the accounting under MFRS 117. Lessors

will continue to classify all leases using the same classification principle as in MFRS 117 and distinguish

between two types of leases: operating and finance leases.

MFRS 16 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019. A lessee can choose to apply

the standard using either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach. The Group is currently

assessing the potential effect of MFRS 16 on its financial statements.

2.3 Summary of significant accounting policies

(a) Basis of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of the Company and its

subsidiary companies as at the reporting date. The financial statements of the subsidiary companies

used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements are prepared for the same reporting

date as the Company. Consistent accounting policies are applied for like transactions and events in

similar circumstances.

The Company controls an investee if and only if the Company has the following:

(i) Power over the investee (i.e. existing rights that give it the current ability to direct the relevant

activities of the investee);

(ii) Exposure, or rights, to variable returns from its investment with the investee; and

(iii) The ability to use its power over the investee to affects its returns.

When the Company has less than a majority of the voting rights of an investee, the Company

considers the following in assessing whether or not the Company’s voting rights in an investee are

sufficient to give it power over the investee:

(i) The size of the Company’s holding of voting rights relative to the size and dispersion of holdings

of the other vote holders;

(ii) Potential voting rights held by the Company, other vote holders or other parties;

financial

statements

113