Background Image
Previous Page  186 / 204 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 186 / 204 Next Page
Page Background

Notes To The

Financial Statements

As at 31 March 2019

38. Material litigation (cont’d.)

(a) Hak Guna Usaha No. 01/Nunukan Utara (cont’d.)

On 13 June 2017, the State Administrative Court delivered an oral judgment and dismissed the application

filed PTNJL to annul the Ministerial Order. On 21 June 2017, PTNJL had filed an application to the Court of

Appeal to appeal against the decision of the State Administrative Court.

The Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Negara Jakarta vide its written decision dated 11 December 2017:

(i) has partly allowed PTNJL’s appeal against the State Administrative Court’s decision, with costs;

(ii) has declared that the Ministerial Order revoking PTNJL’s HGU to be void, save for the areas overlapping

with forestry areas/third party interests measuring 5,138 hectares; and

(iii) has ordered the Defendant to revoke the Ministerial Order save for the areas overlapping with forestry

areas/third party interests measuring 5,138 hectares.

Subsequently, PTNJL filed its statement of appeal on 10 January 2018 and appeal on 23 January 2018 to

the Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia (“Mahkamah Agung”) in respect of the aforesaid decision.

Mahkamah Agung, vide its written decision dated 21 August 2018, has allowed PTNJL’s appeal and ruled

that the Ministerial Order revoking PTNJL’s HGU be annulled. The Mahkamah Agung also ordered the

Defendant, to simultaneously:

(i) issue an order cancelling PTNJL’s HGU rights over the areas overlapping with third party interests

measuring 3,500 hectares; and

(ii) issue a new HGU certificate in favour of PTNJL for an area measuring 16,474.130 hectares, (which is

19,974.130 hectares less the 3,500 hectares referred to in paragraph (i) above).

PTNJL is currently taking the necessary legal steps to enforce the court’s decision.

The amount of write back relating to the impairment of property, plant and equipment previously affected

by the Ministerial Order was RM23,631,000 which has been reflected in the Note 6 and Note 12.

On 18 February 2019, PTNJL’s solicitors has received notice (which was subsequently forwarded to PTNJL

on 19 February 2019) that the Defendant has filed an application for judicial review together with its

judicial review memorandum at the Mahkamah Agung on 8 February 2019. The Defendant is seeking to set

aside the Mahkamah Agung’s written decision dated 21 August 2018 on grounds that the court had among

others misapplied the law to the relevant facts in arriving at the decision. PTNJL has on 18 March 2019

filed a counter memorandum at the Mahkamah Agung in response to the said application. The decision is

currently pending.

Under Indonesian laws and regulations, commencement of judicial review proceedings does not prevent

the implementation of the Mahkamah Agung’s written decision as aforesaid.

182

Fima Corporation Berhad

(21185-P)

Annual Report 2019